From: David Dunham (ddunham@radiomail.net)
Date: Thu 27 Jan 1994 - 20:53:39 EET
>Perhaps this points out that Ceremony has been sliced up in the wrong
>direction.
>I'd much rather see Ceremony<Zorak Zoran> ( well, maybe not *that* one ) or
>Roderick's Ceremony<Darkness> than Ceremony/Spirit or Ceremony/Divine.
But they have Lore/Zorak Zoran. That one makes more sense to me. Having
separate Ceremony could be a real nightmare, if you had to remember where
spells from associate cults came from and use the appropriate Ceremony on
them.
>Pains were made to keep high-powered fighter types ( skill > 100% ) happy.
>Why not do the same favor for Priests and non-clobbering-oriented Lords.
Which was a mistake if it affects play at the far more common < 100% level.
I guess I'm of the school that you play for a long time and then start
thinking about retirement once you make Rune level.
>I get the feeling that that the Authors of RQ:AiG do not take Gregg
>Stafford's views to be the final word on RuneQuest.
That would be Greg's view, as I see it. (Greg certainly isn't interested in
the rules, and has always made Glorantha open to others to change [even if
he reserves the right to change it out from under us].)
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:32:38 EEST