Re: Spell incompatibility

From: Andrew J. Weill (aweill@netcom.com)
Date: Sun 30 Jan 1994 - 09:46:00 EET

• Next message: Carl Fink: "Shakespeare quotes about arrows"
• Previous message: David Dunham: "The slings and arrows of SR + 3"
• Next in thread: devinc@aol.com: "Spell incompatability and higher level playing"
• Reply: devinc@aol.com: "Spell incompatability and higher level playing"
• Reply: David Dunham: "Re: Spell incompatibility"

Am I correct that RAG eliminates the old Countermagic/Shimmer/Spirit
Screen/Protection incompatibility? If so, I foresee problems... the
tactical choices posed by incompatibility made players think. Now a
well-balanced advanced party could be thoroughly defensed...

I'll continue running incompatibility. I never found it to be a tough
rule. What do the rest think?

---Andy Weill

0,,

• Next message: Carl Fink: "Shakespeare quotes about arrows"
• Previous message: David Dunham: "The slings and arrows of SR + 3"
• Next in thread: devinc@aol.com: "Spell incompatability and higher level playing"
• Reply: devinc@aol.com: "Spell incompatability and higher level playing"
• Reply: David Dunham: "Re: Spell incompatibility"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:32:56 EEST