From: David Dunham (ddunham@radiomail.net)
Date: Mon 31 Jan 1994 - 08:41:37 EET
Graeme A Lindsell wrote:
>Devin Cutler writes:
>> I disagree. The fact that most campaigns occur at below 100% does not
>> invalidate my concerns for higher level play. If RQ is to attract a wide
>> audience, it needs to have a mechanism to allow extended play. As far as
>
> I agree totally. It seems silly to include the rules for rune level
>characters and then say that people shouldn't play them because the
>mechanics break down. If a GM wants a campaign with powerful characters -
>and I think several of the published scenarios need them - the game system
>should be able to accept it. I know a lot of people like to play lower
>power campaigns in RQ, but it shouldn't leave out the high power characters.
Rune level characters aren't necessarily over 125% (or whatever level
things break down at). But they are spending 90% of their time in temple
duty, which may make them inappropriate for normal play.
0,,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:33:08 EEST