One more thing.

From: Bryan J. Maloney (jacobus@sonata.cc.purdue.edu)
Date: Mon 21 Feb 1994 - 22:20:56 EET


There is one thing in the RQ:AiG rules that struck me as remarkably foolish:

The application of aging rules for "inactivity". I would NEVER use these
rules for "inactivity" since "inactivity" is very badly defined. Sorry, but
it just doesn't make sense for a mercenary to suddenly start aging because
he's taking time to have a steady job.


0,,


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:35:43 EEST