Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's

From: Tal Meta (talmeta@optonline.net)
Date: Thu 29 Nov 2001 - 18:47:37 EET

• Next message: Hoyle, Guy: "RE: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Previous message: Brad Furst: "[RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• In reply to: Brad Furst: "[RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Next in thread: S.S.Warlock: "Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Reply: S.S.Warlock: "Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"

Brad Furst wrote:
>
> Hasbro turned Avalon Hill's RuneQuest in "RuneQuest: Slayers" which
> is/was briefly available on the web and bore no resemblance to
> Chaosium's RuneQuest except part of the name.

Actually, Hasbro had nothing to do with that, it was all AvHill's
initiative after they lost the Glorantha rights.

-- 
talmeta@optonline.net - Heretic, Dilettante, & God-Machine
AIM - talmeta
ICQ - 12594453
Homepage - <http://talmeta.net>

• Next message: Hoyle, Guy: "RE: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Previous message: Brad Furst: "[RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• In reply to: Brad Furst: "[RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Next in thread: S.S.Warlock: "Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Reply: S.S.Warlock: "Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:35:11 EEST