Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's

From: S.S.Warlock (jurrubin@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri 30 Nov 2001 - 15:26:23 EET

• Next message: Dury, Pascal: "RE : [RQ-RULES] Archives"
• Previous message: S.S.Warlock: "Re: [RQ-RULES] Archives"
• In reply to: Tal Meta: "Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Next in thread: Hoyle, Guy: "RE: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"

Ah, I see. Pity. I really liked the publishing quality AvHill
put on the RQ products. Their RQ3 rules compilation softback
has come in really handy for me. In fact, most of my RQ
collection is made up of AvHill's RQ3 publications. Most of
my RQ2 stuff had died from overuse.

David

Tal Meta wrote:
>
> Brad Furst wrote:
> >
> > Hasbro turned Avalon Hill's RuneQuest in "RuneQuest: Slayers" which
> > is/was briefly available on the web and bore no resemblance to
> > Chaosium's RuneQuest except part of the name.
>
> Actually, Hasbro had nothing to do with that, it was all AvHill's
> initiative after they lost the Glorantha rights.
>
> --
> talmeta@optonline.net - Heretic, Dilettante, & God-Machine
> AIM - talmeta
> ICQ - 12594453
> Homepage - <http://talmeta.net>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules@crashbox.com
> http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules
> http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules

• Next message: Dury, Pascal: "RE : [RQ-RULES] Archives"
• Previous message: S.S.Warlock: "Re: [RQ-RULES] Archives"
• In reply to: Tal Meta: "Re: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"
• Next in thread: Hoyle, Guy: "RE: [RQ-Rules] new material published since the mid-90's"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:35:12 EEST