Re: [RQ-Rules] reply to poll

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Alan Chambers (alanross@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed 05 Dec 2001 - 16:35:43 EET

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hoyle, Guy" <Guy.Hoyle@Nextel.com>
To: <rq-rules@crashbox.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:24 AM
Subject: RE: [RQ-Rules] reply to poll

> Still, that's not a very long time to run a poll. Many people don't check
> their email on the weekends.
>
> Guy
>

Maybe we should run a thread on what people use. let them say what varients
they use and why. As long as nobody gets insulting I think that would be
fun.
Alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jerrym [mailto:jerrym@lanset.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:17 AM
> To: 'rq-rules@crashbox.com'
> Subject: [RQ-Rules] reply to poll
>
>
> the poll I did on yahoo wasn't a day..it was 36 hours..from Friday night
> until Monday ...it purpose was to take a 'snapshot' of what version people
> are using...
>
> now, I have a broad idea of that and so RQIII is what I'll reference..(its
> also the only version I have)..
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.303 / Virus Database: 164 - Release Date: 11/24/01
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules@crashbox.com
> http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules
> http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules@crashbox.com
> http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules
> http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules
>

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:35:23 EEST