Re: [RQ-Rules] Extension?

From: Joseph Elric Smith (kruch7@cox.net)
Date: Thu 11 Apr 2002 - 19:04:20 EEST


Well glad to see I am not the only one going through a traveler experience.
ken

Gygax is to Gaming what Kirby was to comic
Alas poor Elric I was a thousand times more evil than you

----- Original Message -----
From: <MurfNMurf@aol.com>
To: <rq-rules@crashbox.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [RQ-Rules] Extension?

> Well, I don't have _either_ rulebook handy right now (going through a
> Traveller ship building phase right now), but IIRC, _Extension_ operates
> differently under RQ2 than it does in RQ3. Not being able to remember the
> particulars, I _do_ remember chucking RQ3's somewhat limited version in
favor
> of the better RQ2 definition :)
>
> -Ken Murphy-
>
> We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other
> languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their
> pockets for new vocabulary. --James D. Nicoll
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> RQ-Rules mailing list
> RQ-Rules@crashbox.com
> http://www.crashbox.com/rq-rules
> http://www.crashbox.com/mailman/listinfo/rq-rules


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat 05 Jul 2003 - 20:37:29 EEST