Re: King Bee (and real comments)

From: BEThexton (bethexton@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat 23 Feb 2002 - 04:04:56 EET

• Next message: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] resources"
• Previous message: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] resources"
• In reply to: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] Re: King Bee (and real comments)"
• Next in thread: jeffkyer: "Re: King Bee (and real comments)"
• Reply: jeffkyer: "Re: King Bee (and real comments)"

• In stormsteads@y..., "John Hughes" <nysalor@p...> wrote:
  > If we don't feature honey as a special feature of our first stead -
  >
  > Or we could do 'honey' up as an example of a stand-alone 'plug-in'
  module
  > that narrators could add to any stead if it interests them.
  >
  

me likes this! "Here is a completely generic stead. Here is an example of how it could instead be a specialized stead. Here is another example of how it could something else again." Modular is good, so long as there is a useable baseline for those that only want that.

--Bryan

• Next message: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] resources"
• Previous message: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] resources"
• In reply to: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] Re: King Bee (and real comments)"
• Next in thread: jeffkyer: "Re: King Bee (and real comments)"
• Reply: jeffkyer: "Re: King Bee (and real comments)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu 18 Sep 2003 - 23:01:59 EEST