Re: [stormsteads] Time for a revival?

From: Bryan Thexton (bethexton@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue 12 Nov 2002 - 16:47:14 EET

• Next message: mrmarcpolo: "Whole Cow plus"
• Previous message: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] Time for a revival?"
• In reply to: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] Time for a revival?"
• Next in thread: mrmarcpolo: "Whole Cow plus"

• John Hughes <nysalor@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
  > For my part, I have generated a full list of Svenstead folk, with
  > ages,
  > bloodlines, names, and some basic relationships, as per the formulae
  > we were
  > working on when transmission ceased. I will try and put this up on
  > the web
  > in the next week or so.
  

Awesome, John! (I feel that way so often about your work that I may have to just start calling you "Awesome John.") That will make it a lot easier for people to generate bits without worries of skewing the population too badly one way or another.

As for coordination--I agree that trying to coordinate things tightly was doubtless more grief than it ended up being worth. Let's see how things evolve for a while with a less structured approach, and we can always change again later.

--Bryan

• Next message: mrmarcpolo: "Whole Cow plus"
• Previous message: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] Time for a revival?"
• In reply to: John Hughes: "Re: [stormsteads] Time for a revival?"
• Next in thread: mrmarcpolo: "Whole Cow plus"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu 18 Sep 2003 - 23:03:23 EEST