In message <20070418031739.21507.qmail_at_JqDxFTJJPnqYCa5C4vKUTOLHt3belSUwHbFy8z3By8LKGf90l_2SuYblmPquYZN72tLKGf-1PVRLPtDUvegrKK9oT87xVa4DK4BvqmxI.yahoo.invalid> Peter Metcalfe writes:
>At 01:41 a.m. 18/04/2007, you wrote:
>
>>I don't think we have an objective explanation of chaos in
>>Glorantha.
>
>Having a chaotic feature is pretty much an objective
>test of being a chaotic.
Certainly. However not all chaotic beings have chaotic features and what is a chaotic feature? A tentacle instead of an arm is clear enough, but how about an extra finger?
Nor does this address the issue of how and why chaos spreads.
-- Donald Oddy http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/Received on Wed 18 Apr 2007 - 12:55:23 EEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:48:50 EET