Peter Metcalfe
> You originally claimed that the burning was necessary to the
> fertility of Aldryami forests.
Rob Helm reminisced from his playing in David's Umathela campaign.
David gave one example of a tree that uses serotiny.
Nobody claimed that burning down an entire forest is required for fertility.
> If the Orlanthi are not burning
> down Aldraymi forests on a regular basis, then how is it
> necessary?
Who requires Orlanthi to burn down Aldryami forests on a regular basis? David explicitely doesn't.
> The examples you keep pointing out to us
> are that a fire creates a hole in the canopy and the tree
> senses this through the smoke and drops its seeds. But
> if the fire's miles away then there's no holes being created
> in the canopy and the smoke's not thick enough to trigger
> seed-dropping.
Did you read up Serotiny?
>>There may be other ways to clear, but proper slash & burn is >>not hard on the forest if you look at it as a system:
> If I were an Aldryami, I would not care how hard or easy slash-
> and-burn is.
You would listen to the song of your forest. That would make you share both in the grief of/for the burnt specimen in a limited area, and in the vigorous life reconquering that area.
> What I would be concerned about is the widespread
> use of fire and command my pet humans to stop doing it.
Forbid axes, while you're at it, and saws and knives.
It was suggested that humans practicing a forest-related agriculture would be a good first defense line or at least a good buffer versus Fonritian aggression towards the thick aldryami forest. Limiting their use of fire to swidden methods (keeping a fair number of trees unharmed) and enforcing strict fallow periods, along with a strong presence of colonizing tree species and fire-resistant or even serotinous ones does paint a reasonable picture.
Peter's position could be summed up as "Aldryami aren't reasonable about fire."
Personally, I see more potential in some species of aldryami being reasonable about limited use of fire while others taking Peter's stance. Received on Mon 11 Jun 2007 - 04:14:54 EEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:49:18 EET