In message <200708231152.22534.akuma_at_1A3qXvIwSBhixWhggM3YJJ7U1DIlq_ZI3sATWIGeCK1F4484tO3MMKHq_h6h2tvrkD8tDnEM5wawg8W8DOTD5INIacoW2ytv70o.yahoo.invalid> Gouki writes:
>
>I was wondering wether it was punishable or not to kill while defending one's
>tula against raiders from another Orlanthi clan. In this case, does wergild
>apply or not?
>
>The defender was a humakti gest who was fighting alone against six people
>(including a weaponthane).
Any raider who tangles with the follower of a death god deserves what happens to them.
However their kin could have a claim both against the host and the
Humatki personally. I suppose there might be political reasons why
the host would pay wergeld but I'd expect the Humatki to respond
by challenging the other clan to put up a champion to fight a duel
to resolve the claim. As the Orlanthi saying goes "Violence is always
an option".
--
Donald Oddy
http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/
Received on Thu 23 Aug 2007 - 06:10:24 EEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:50:04 EET