Re: [WorldofGlorantha] Re: Murdering raiders

From: <donald_at_CHLM0__sSHrbdOrhju7iW4t-tyNtw02__yjBpmNDnxqobU28MvugtQk38CTif1RWg5MQemPb>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:01:50 GMT


In message <fak7uq+k1le@eGroups.com> "bryan_thx" writes:

>I agree that killing during raids--on both sides--would normally be
>discouraged. What goes around comes around and all of that.
>
>But I can't imagine that an attacking clan would have a claim for
>deaths that occurred on the defending clan's tula. It someone enters
>your tula and does not ask for hospitality, my impression was that
>legally you were basically free to do with them as you wll.

I see raids as a ritual practice with strictly limited objectives which don't seriously damage either clan. Cuts and bruises are to be expected but killing or maiming someone is a serious injury to the clan.

The host's best defence to a claim for wergeld would be that the dead man and his friends took on a Humakti in what was supposed to be a raid. That's stupidity, raiders normally back off when they encounter weaponthanes.

-- 
Donald Oddy
http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/

           
Received on Thu 23 Aug 2007 - 13:19:44 EEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:50:05 EET