On Dec 9, 2007 10:50 AM, Stewart Stansfield <stu_stansfield_at_SIAcl-FW_6fBu0iFy65igzqSTotyn-ld_L2LcQspy8AnQl8_FB7d_j4QxoUl8ZtYIp6pyjeJ2ly1Df4LbyMbdZdkgnc.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Serious question. Do the ducks of the Durulz Valley possess mounted
> warriors? [Or have they done so at any point in history?] I don't
> necessarily mean as a common expression of arms, but maybe as a small
> heroband.
>
> The image of a durulz lancer riding some beast is innately appealing to
> me; and there are various good reasons as to why some ducks might
> domesticate/subdue beasts and use them in war.
>
> The problem is 'what'.
How about bears? They swim, they fish, they climb, the sprint awfully fast. Depending on the breed, they'd be big enough to ride, and with the right riding harness, the ducks could ride them into battle with lances or other mounted weapons, and after the initial charge, the bear could stand and attack and the duck could still manage archery (or magic) from above and behind the bear's head.
I have no idea what sort of walking speed/range a bear usually manages. Being omnivores, I suspect things could get dicey with bears under a seige or a long, hard ride; having a ride that's able and potentially willing to eat you if it doesn't get fed regularly presents something of a hazard.
> I'm really, really taken by the idea of Giant Swamp Toads.
> A mount that jumps rather than just swims/walks is novel
Elephants. Some sort of small elephants. Upkeep's expensive, because they eat a lot, but they'd make pretty cool cavalry.
Or maybe large elephants, with war platforms on the back. LOTR-TRTK, except with ducks rather than orcs.
Grimmund
--
"Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash, and I am delighted to say
that I have no grasp of it, whatsoever!" - Baron Munchausen
Received on Sun 09 Dec 2007 - 09:43:46 EET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:50:30 EET