On Dec 11, 2007 9:52 AM, bryan_thx <bethexton_at_p3S5LfB0ojWbrtBaH9hnNbM5uIU23vbsEi_xxFuAbwe9Kpe1kWChoL5sMLNTJoeETIuPsONeS-i6Sn9vwg.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
Wheels on watercraft not generally advised, for the reason you note.
Extra drag means lower water speed.
Getting stuck in soft mud would be bad; chariots are useful because of
their mobility; lacking that, they'd be a high priority target for
> Instead of cavalry, how about chariots? Maybe with enclosed bodies
> and pulled by something amphibious, so that they can go from land to
> water? (although they'd still have trouble with soft mud).
Ducks on small magical hovercraft of some sort, would be interesting... Powered by some sort of limited elevation flight spell, no doubt. Allows them mobility over water, mud, and dry ground...
Real hovercraft, though, present their own problems at fighting platforms. One of the things that make cavalry effective is the additional impact energy from the weight of the mount being added to that of the fighter, and part of what makes that effective the mount's firm contact with the surface. Hovercraft still have a lot of intertial energy, but because they lack solid contact with the surface, they can't turn as quickly, and they tend to bounce when they hit things. The collision is a lot more elastic than that of a vehicle or mount actually on the surface.
(sea-born rams have the same problem, but water is much thicker than air, so sea-born vehicles tend to bounce a lot less than airborne ones.)
That sort of complex magic would make them fairly rare, though... And expensive.
Grimmund
--
"Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash, and I am delighted to say
that I have no grasp of it, whatsoever!" - Baron Munchausen
Received on Tue 11 Dec 2007 - 08:44:03 EET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri 04 Jan 2008 - 22:50:30 EET